Yes, I love my sex toys, and can no longer imagine my sexuality without them. But then, I'm extremely grateful to my former university's feminist group, to my local lesbian-owned-feminist sex shop, and to my local kink scene for disseminating information on sex-toy-safety and proper cleaning. I strongly recommend Violet Blue's article on the subject, which explains:
Most sex toys (and products) that you’ll find in garden-variety retail sex toys stores are created, marketed and sold “for novelty use only”, meaning that while the toy companies explicitly know that people are using their toys for sexual use, they sell them categorized as “novelties." ...Novelties often feature the latest innovations in design and use — but also tend to break easily, some are made with noxious materials, and they can ship defective with user-unfriendly return policies...So I say thank you to the folks at "Shop Erotica!" for teaching that sex toys are fun, "non-intimidating," and can be associated with "nice, normal" women. But when spokeswoman Miyoko says of their Dual Penetrator 250, "Now ladies, you might be a little concerned about this because of the double penetration," I'd say double penetration isn't really the "concerning" part. I'm concerned that it has no materials disclosure, and that she doesn't advise anyone to cover it with a condom. This toy needs a condom, because I'm willing to bet that the surface is porous, which means that after you're done playing, you can't really clean it. Besides not knowing whether it leaches noxious chemicals.
...There are two basic hygienic differences you’ll need to know when choosing a toy: porous versus non-porous materials. Non-porous toys are made of materials (like silicone, hard plastic, glass, metal and stone) that are easy to clean and do not retain bacteria in the tiny pockets or pores in the surface. What this means is that when you clean one of these toys, they’re completely clean and don’t have the potential to carry STDs or bacteria that can infect (or re-infect) the user...
I'm also seriously concerned that they're charging $111.49 for the 7th Heaven Blue Beaver, which looks like it's made of a similar cheap jelly and contains no materials disclosure. For comparison, I got my similarly-shaped Mary Mermaid from my local lesbian-owned-feminist sex shop for only about $80, and it's made of non-porous silicone, which can be bleached sterile. Similarly, there's no reason to spend $129.95 on "Shop Erotic!"'s glass Helix Dichio when you can get a same-size glass Las Vegas dildo from Tulip for $45.
So how do they stay in business? I suspect the general TV audience's unawareness of other sex-toy options or how much sex toys are supposed to cost, which is likely perpetuated by the general TV audience's embarrassment from doing their research. Perhaps they're charging an embarrassment tax.
And I remember being that embarrassed about buying sex toys, and needing someone to specifically tell me it was okay. I'm exceptionally lucky that when I turned eighteen, I had a close friend two months my senior who dragged me to our local sex shop and insisted that she wouldn't let me leave until I bought something. At the time, I too was intimidated by the wall of unknown possibilities. Then, for lack of better knowledge, I too bought a vibrator covered in a cheap jelly. And it probably gathered bacteria and leached chemicals for a couple years, until my university's feminist group hosted a presentation that convinced me to upgrade.
For everyone without a friend like mine, Miyoko at "Shop Erotic!" may serve the same influence. But then, here's a list of websites selling cheaper, higher-quality sex toys:
http://www.early2bed.com/
http://www.babeland.com/
http://www.goodvibes.com/
http://mytulip.com/index.php
http://www.smittenkittenonline.com/

用行動來支持你~~~不留言不行!........................................
ReplyDelete